Recently Google recommended strongly against using dynamic rendering as a workaround for JavaScript sites going forward, Google updated its help documentation to strongly say not to use it. But that does not mean it would hurt your rankings, today, to use dynamic rendering compared to server-side rendering.
Google's John Mueller responded to a question on Reddit where the person asked, "Anyone know of any case studies looking at switching from dynamic rendering to server side rendering?" Adding "This will be a heavy lift that was struck down before so I hoping to find good data."
John responded right away by saying, "There are no SEO ranking bonuses for implementing it one way or another." He added "they're just different ways of making the content indexable (as is client side rendering)."
Here is the full block of what he said:
There are no SEO ranking-bonuses for implementing it one way or another - they're just different ways of making the content indexable (as is client side rendering). The differences between dynamic rendering and server side rendering from my POV are more in terms of practical infrastructure setup & maintenance (it can also affect speed, depending on how you have things set up). There's no rush to switch away from dynamic rendering, it's not going to become unsupported or cause issues from Google. The change over time is just that nowadays, if you have a JS-based site, there are better options (either good CSR or SSR) available, so doing things...
Read Full Story: https://www.seroundtable.com/google-seo-dynamic-rendering-or-server-side-rendering-33947.html
Your content is great. However, if any of the content contained herein violates any rights of yours, including those of copyright, please contact us immediately by e-mail at media[@]kissrpr.com.
